← All disclosure profiles · Compare claims · People and connections
UFO DISCLOSURE · SOURCE PROFILE
Former Air Force imagery specialist; a reported 2012 encounter and later programme and retaliation allegations.
11 claim entries · source check 10 November 2026
The record so far
Keep three strands separate: what he says he personally saw in 2012, information he says he encountered later at work, and interpretations advanced in interviews. The date on a testimony document is not the date of the original incident.
Background in plain English
In plain English: an imagery analyst studies photographs, video and other sensor information to identify activity and objects. Borland describes Air Force service from 2010 to 2013 and later contractor analysis work. His 2012 sighting was a personal visual account, not a released sensor recording. Borland — written statement for the House task force · p. 1.
How to read this record
“Official text checked” verifies what the document says, not whether the underlying allegation is true. Podcast entries below are clearly marked when they rely on transcript review. This is a growing source record, not a complete archive of every appearance.
Claims at a glance
Each entry keeps a stable reference so it can be compared with other people and later statements. The date is the statement or episode date; earlier events are identified in the text.
B01 · A close triangle at Langley
2025-09-09 · Retrospective firsthand observation
He reported a roughly hundred-foot triangular object nearby at Langley in summer 2012.
Borland — written statement for the House task force · p. 1
B02 · Appearance and phone interference
2025-09-09 · Retrospective sensory account
He described a changing surface, silence and disruption to his phone.
Borland — written statement for the House task force · p. 1
B03 · Rapid ascent
2025-09-09 · Witness estimate, not released instrument data
He said it climbed to airliner altitude in seconds, without sound or wind disturbance.
Borland — written statement for the House task force · p. 1
B04 · Later programme knowledge
2025-09-09 · Claimed later access, distinct from the sighting
He said a subsequent sensitive job exposed him to information about a retrieval programme.
Borland — written statement for the House task force · p. 1
B05 · Reprisals and reporting
2025-09-09 · Personal account; findings not supplied
He alleged career obstruction, a March 2023 AARO meeting and an August 2023 ICIG interview.
Borland — written statement for the House task force · pp. 1–2
B06 · Limits on his AARO disclosure
2025-09-09 · Important qualification to his account
He said he withheld sources and methods to protect people from retaliation.
Borland — written statement for the House task force · p. 2
B07 · More detail in the later interview
2026-08-05 · Retrospective account; transcript review
He described a hundred-to-hundred-and-fifty-foot triangle, lights, an overheated phone and a rapid departure. These are later elaborations on the 2012 account, not a new incident.
American Alchemy / Jesse Michels — Dylan Borland interview · approximately 28–33 minutes
B08 · Non-human does not necessarily mean extraterrestrial
2026-08-05 · Origin assertion; transcript review
He asserted that recovered craft were not made by humanity, while distinguishing that assertion from proof of extraterrestrials.
American Alchemy / Jesse Michels — Dylan Borland interview · approximately 52–55 minutes
B09 · Biology and genetics
2026-08-05 · Qualified support, not public laboratory evidence; transcript review
He expressed belief in a biological/genetic component and agreement with Grusch, but qualified the boundary of what he could discuss.
American Alchemy / Jesse Michels — Dylan Borland interview · approximately 1:01–1:03
B10 · A theory about other UAP teams
2026-08-05 · Theory, not established organisational history; transcript review
He entertained a theory that newer UAP efforts were used to test ideas for an older programme.
American Alchemy / Jesse Michels — Dylan Borland interview · approximately 1:19
B11 · A programme name left unconfirmed
2026-08-05 · Non-confirmation; transcript review
He did not confirm the interviewer’s proposed Rubik’s Cube label. A question, title or suggestion is not his confirmation.
American Alchemy / Jesse Michels — Dylan Borland interview · approximately 6:24
In their own words
Short extracts checked against the linked written source. Read the full exchange for context. Podcast wording is not presented as audio-verified while that check is pending.
“the material it was made of appeared fluid or dynamic”
Borland — written statement for the House task force · 9 September 2025 · p. 1
“I did not share sources and methods information”
Borland — written statement for the House task force · 9 September 2025 · p. 2
Dated appearances and source trail
Borland — written statement for the House task force
2025-09-09 · Original source
Official two-page statement read in full. The hearing took place on 9 September; the document was posted in advance.
House task force — hearing page and official recording
2025-09-09 · Original source
Date, witness list and links checked. Full oral-hearing review is not complete.
American Alchemy / Jesse Michels — Dylan Borland interview
2026-08-05 · Original source
Transcript used for indexing · Automated text can mishear names, numbers and speakers.
Publisher channel/upload date checked. Selected passages read in automatically captioned text; the recording has not been independently replayed for quotation checks.
Who worked with whom?
- BAE Systems and Intrepid Solutions — employment described in his statement. Listing employers does not mean those organisations endorse his account. Borland — written statement for the House task force · p. 1.
- David Grusch — a reference point in his disclosure account. Borland says he went to the ICIG after Grusch’s 2023 testimony. In the later interview he expresses qualified agreement on biology. Neither point establishes that they worked on a recovery programme together. Borland — written statement for the House task force · p. 2 · American Alchemy / Jesse Michels — Dylan Borland interview · approximately 1:01–1:03.
- Jesse Michels — interviewer. The long interview supplies additional claims and hypotheses; its host’s suggestions and video title are not automatically Borland’s statements.
What remains unresolved
The reviewed material does not provide UKPX with a publicly inspectable recovered craft, biological sample, or an independently repeatable test establishing non-human manufacture. Statements about classified submissions should be followed through the actual available records; their existence alone would not settle their contents.
AARO’s March 2024 historical report states that it found no empirical evidence for government or private-company reverse-engineering of extraterrestrial technology. UKPX reviewed its introduction and executive summary (printed pp. 6–10) through an archived copy. This is a dated official assessment, not an individual finding on later statements. AARO / DoD — Historical Record Report, Volume I · Read the archived government report.
Review queue and coverage
- Review the complete original 2025 hearing video and WEAPONIZED interview; log any edited, redacted or differently phrased passages separately.
- Verify the original recording against machine captions before publishing verbatim podcast quotations.
- Seek the actual AARO/ICIG records and any public responses relevant to his specific account; do not substitute a general agency statement for a finding on his case.
Review date: 10 November 2026. Initial UKPX profile. Later additions should retain the earlier wording/date, link repetitions to the same claim, and distinguish corrections, elaborations and new assertions.