24 September 2026 · First online (indexed publication record)
Amy S F Lutz
Journal of bioethical inquiry · Narrative-ethics analysis
This paper examines ethical responsibilities surrounding The Telepathy Tapes, particularly the treatment of nonspeaking autistic people and claims involving facilitated communication.
Method and scope
The author uses narrative ethics to compare respectful attention to lived experience with the need to scrutinise potentially harmful interpretations.
What to keep in mind
This is an ethical argument, not a controlled test of telepathy. Its conclusions and criticism should be attributed to the author.
Original paper & source
Read the original source record →
DOI: 10.1007/s11673-026-10617-w
Related publication or contrasting perspective →
Indexed original abstract, citation and linked publication-status metadata reviewed through Europe PMC; full text not assessed. UKPX reference added and checked 7 November 2026. The date above belongs to the paper.