In Lafcadio Hearn’s account, a young neighbour named Riki dies and is said to return in a much wealthier household. The link is a name: Riki’s mother reportedly writes it on his left palm after death, and a newborn in another Tokyo district is subsequently said to bear the same characters. The unusual detail makes the story more specific than a general belief in rebirth, but the route by which Hearn learns it is essential to assessing the claim.
The account appears as “Riki-Baka” in Kwaidan: Stories and Studies of Strange Things, published in 1904. Hearn describes knowing Riki personally. The alleged birth mark, however, comes through a later conversation with a woodcutter. The text does not say that Hearn saw the infant or the characters, met the second family or inspected the grave.
The young man Hearn remembered
Hearn begins with the meaning of the name Riki: strength. The accompanying nickname, which provides the original story’s title, is an insulting label connected with the young man’s disability. It belongs to the historical text and is not a diagnosis. Hearn describes Riki at sixteen as physically tall and strong, while portraying his understanding and play as those of a much younger child.
The opening mixes affection, impatience and social distance. Riki plays with small children, rides a broomstick as a hobby-horse and laughs loudly on the slope outside Hearn’s house. Hearn eventually tells him to find another place to play because of the noise. Riki obeys and leaves unhappily. The narrative also mentions an episode involving a fire, but does not present a medical history or an independently checked account of his condition.
After Riki disappears from the street, Hearn says that he does not immediately miss him. Months pass before he asks the neighbourhood woodcutter what happened. Riki had sometimes helped the man carry bundles of fuel. This connection gives the conversation a local context: the person relating the story is someone who had known the young man, rather than an unnamed distant newspaper correspondent.
A death, a prayer and a name
The woodcutter says that Riki died suddenly nearly a year earlier, and attributes the death to a disease of the brain, as described by doctors. That is a medical explanation reported at second hand. The text supplies neither a doctor’s statement nor a dated medical record, and it would be misleading to turn this brief account into a modern clinical conclusion.
According to the woodcutter, Riki’s mother wrote his name on his left palm after he died. She used a Chinese character for Riki and Japanese phonetic script for the second part. She then prayed that he would be born again in happier circumstances. The writing is therefore described as a deliberate action by the mother, preceding the later claim that similar characters appeared on a child.
About three months before the conversation, the woodcutter continues, a boy was born in a prosperous Kōjimachi household with legible characters on his left palm matching Riki’s name and nickname. The family supposedly interpreted the mark as an answer to someone’s prayer and began making inquiries. A vegetable seller told them about the young man who had lived in Ushigome and died the previous autumn.
The servants and the grave-clay
Two servants then reportedly visited Riki’s mother. She was delighted by the prospect that her son had entered a wealthy household. Their employers were less pleased with the insulting second part of the name appearing on their child. The servants asked where Riki had been buried and requested clay from his grave.
The mother is said to have led them to the cemetery of Zendōji, where they collected some clay in a cloth wrapper. They gave her ten yen. When Hearn asks why they wanted the material, the woodcutter explains a belief that characters appearing in this way on a reborn child can be removed by rubbing the skin with earth from the previous body’s grave.
The story ends with that explanation. It does not report a witnessed application, describe what happened to the mark afterwards or document the child’s later development. The clay is part of the account’s proposed remedy, rather than a test whose result Hearn records. The account should not be extended into an assertion that the mark was successfully removed.
What the names and dates leave open
The wealthy house is identified only as Nanigashi-Sama’s. An accompanying note explicitly explains that this is a substitute meaning so-and-so, used by Hearn instead of the real name. It cannot responsibly be treated as an actual family surname to be traced to a modern property. Kōjimachi supplies an area, but not the residence.
The chronology is likewise relative. The woodcutter refers to nearly a year since the death, a birth about three months before their conversation and a death in the preceding autumn. No calendar year anchors the conversation. Assigning 1904 as the incident year merely because the book appeared then would create information the source does not provide.
Hearn’s personal acquaintance with Riki supports a narrower part of the narrative than the rebirth claim. The latter depends on what the woodcutter says about the mother, servants, second household and newborn. There are no separate statements from those people in the published account, no photograph or clinical description of the palm and no independent record showing when the two families learned about each other.
The outcome is insufficient evidence for reincarnation. The text is valuable as an identifiable historical account of marking the dead, recognising a supposed rebirth and attempting to remove an unwanted sign. Its specificity should be preserved without confusing a detailed story with a verified chain of physical observations.
Location and a related public memorial
The map uses a broad Kōjimachi quarter reference, rounded to 35.68,139.74, for the reported birth setting. It does not identify the larger historical district’s unnamed house, Riki’s grave or the mother’s home in Ushigome. No private address has been reconstructed from the story.
A separate, visitable author memorial is Koizumi Yakumo Memorial Park in Okubo, Shinjuku. The city’s official page describes its Greek-inspired design, memorial information and bust of Hearn. It lists opening hours of 08:00–18:00 from April to September and 08:00–17:00 from October to March. This is a place to explore Hearn’s legacy; it is not presented as the newborn’s residence or a proven paranormal site. The 2009 photograph shows the park’s entrance and garden.
The complete Riki-Baka narrative and its corresponding notes were read for this article. The notes clarify the phonetic writing, anonymised family name, Kōjimachi setting and cloth wrapper. A related, separately sourced historical rebirth account is Katsugorō’s 1823 claim; neither account should be treated as independent verification of the other.
Visit Koizumi Yakumo Memorial Park, Shinjuku
Related author memorial in Okubo, not a verified Riki encounter, birth or grave site. Shinjuku City lists opening08:00–18:00April–September and08:00–17:00October–March; check on-site notices. The case map pin is Kōjimachi, not the park.
Official visitor information → · Access information checked 2026-11-13. Check current opening and booking details before travelling.
Share an experience here →Experiences at Koizumi Yakumo Memorial Park, Shinjuku
First-person accounts shared by visitors and reviewed before publication. They are separate from the researched case above.
No visitor reports have been published here yet.